Choice Democracy
نویسنده
چکیده
Democracy is defined by two core tenets: voice and pluralism. Within these constraints, a wide variety of regime types can be designed. We show that the only new, untested form of democracy is when every citizen is governed by the political party of his/her choice. Multiple full-fledged governments would coexist in the same national territory at the same time, each one sovereign only over the people who chose to vote for it — hence the name: “Choice Democracy”. Choice Democracy can be regarded as pure polyarchy, the broadest form of political competition, and a robust mechanism for disciplining government agencies. We argue that this system makes democracy more stable by reducing the risk of revolutionary and financial crises. We develop a theory for the optimal number of governments per countries, where the answer is determined by a trade-off between cooperation and competition. We also provide evidence indicating that Choice Democracy would be viable in the real world.
منابع مشابه
A Failure of Representative Democracy∗
We compare direct democracy, in which members of a population cast votes for alternatives as choice problems arrive, and representative democracy, in which a population elects a candidate whose ordering of alternatives serves as a binding, contingent plan of action for future choice problems. While direct democracy is normatively appealing, representative democracy has practical advantages and ...
متن کاملRepresentative democracy and the implementation of majority-preferred alternatives
In this paper, we study representative democracy, one of the most popular classes of collective decision-making mechanisms, and contrast it with direct democracy. In a direct democracy, individuals have the opportunity to vote over the alternatives in every choice problem the population faces. In a representative democracy, the population commits to a candidate ex ante who will then make choice...
متن کاملDirect and Representative Democracy When States Learn From Their Neighbours
Voters in democracies can learn from the experience of neighbouring states: about policy in a direct democracy (“policy experimentation”), about the quality of their politicians in a representative democracy (“yardstick competition”). Learning between states creates spillovers from policy choice, and also from constitutional choice. I model these spillovers in a simple principalagent framework,...
متن کاملp-Democracy a Pervasive Majority Rule
Today, group decision making in our democratic society uses the non-ranked method. What we need is an improved method that allows decision makers to indicate not only their chosen alternative, but also their order of preference by which all alternatives will be placed. We classify this as a particular Social Choice Function, where choice is a group decision-making methodology in an ideal democr...
متن کاملDirect Democracy and Tiebout Exit
This paper examines the impact that direct democracy (political participation) has on the location choice of citizens. Because location is defined in terms of private and public amenities, the citizen’s decision involves a choice of a mixed bundle of goods. Since public amenities are the outcome of a collective rather than private action and is influenced by the political setting, this choice o...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011